Jump to content

nadeem

Members
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

nadeem's Achievements

Enthusiast

Enthusiast (6/14)

  • Collaborator
  • Very Popular Rare
  • One Year In
  • Reacting Well
  • Dedicated

Recent Badges

144

Reputation

  1. I think if they ask only for ipv6 your config should be good
  2. Hi Folks, regarding correcting the bgp wrong configuration in this section or type of configuration in any section , should we remove wrong configuration if we don't need to do that as Cisco restrict candidate from removing any configuration uneless they say so , example which one 1 or 2: Note: (1) will work normally. 1-router bgp 65006 bgp log-neighbor-changes network 10.6.255.61 mask 255.255.255.255 neighbor 100.5.61.1 remote-as 10000 ! address-family ipv4 vrf WAN network 10.6.255.61 mask 255.255.255.255 neighbor 100.5.61.1 remote-as 10000 neighbor 100.5.61.1 activate exit-address-family 2-router bgp 65006 bgp log-neighbor-changes no network 10.6.255.61 mask 255.255.255.255 no neighbor 100.5.61.1 remote-as 10000 ! address-family ipv4 vrf WAN network 10.6.255.61 mask 255.255.255.255 neighbor 100.5.61.1 remote-as 10000 neighbor 100.5.61.1 activate exit-address-family
  3. as far I know that they mentioned DC in area 0 and HQ in area 1 but link between them they did not mention anything about it.
  4. I modified my original post to be more clear , hope you will get what I mean now.
  5. well I mentioned that we don't need virtual link in case the connections between switches 101/201 & switches 102/202 was in area 1 so in this case switches SW201/SW202 will become the ABRs.
  6. If the links between SW101/SW201 and SW102/SW202 was in area 0 (you can say if the link between HQ and DC was in area 0) we will need make SW102 cost is worst including the area range command plus WE NEED TO USE virtual link because without virtual link as mentioned before SW102 will prefer O that coming from directly connected SW202 routes over O IA routes that will come from SW101, however if the links between SW101/SW201 and SW102/SW202 was in area 1 (link between HQ and DC was in area 1) we just need make SW102 cost is worst including the area range without the need of virtual link because all routes now are O IA. what you guys think ?
  7. only few questions are solved the rest is not yet [Hidden Content]
  8. Hi Guys, can any one help suggestion good network automation training for CCIE EI .so far I didn't see good training about it in INE or other vendors or famous trainers , like no one grapping the CCIE blueprint points about automation and start explaining and labbing them .most of CCIE training just offering few simple sessions about it.
  9. I think KB is good if you are not new to CCIE INE for routing and switching still the same "one of the best" but for new stuff not sure yet . if you like to go deep and discover new things you wouldn't think about it brfore with very good and detailed LABS try Orhan.
×
×
  • Create New...