EI LAB Configs

[kat]

Hello,
I failed lab exam recently.

This attachment is what I configured in the exam.

I am skeptical about 1.15 and couldn't complete 2.1 and 2.5. but I got 80％ in SDN module from the report
In section 3.2, I configured gateway address wrongly and Autmation  section was 60％.

Please check it and give me your advice.

 

Thank you,

 

Edited April 21, 2023 by kat

[z3xpert]

@kat

Sorry for hearing this my buddy, hope you'll get your digits next time.
We'll review your config and keep you posted, otherwise, for DES you've got the same questions?

[kat]

4 minutes ago, z3xpert said:

@kat

Sorry for hearing this my buddy, hope you'll get your digits next time.
We'll review your config and keep you posted, otherwise, for DES you've got the same questions?

I passed the design section and it was not new one?

[bengini]

Hey @katfrom what I saw quickly in your config in my opinion there are  few not needed and wrong which might have caused losing points, more  I don't understand how can you pass without finishing section 2.1-2.5 this will impact your overall score, can you share more of the feedback provided, so we can go on through technologies and try to find out what is wrong on the dump:

 

 1.2 
 Is not necessary or required:
           spanning-tree link-type point-to-point

 1.4
        Is not necessary or required:
         area 1 virtual-link 10.1.255.102
         area 1 range 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
 area 1 virtual-link 10.1.255.101 cost 100
 it should be:
  area 1 range 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 cost 100

 1.6
  ipv6 nd ra interval msec 1000
 ipv6 nd ra lifetime 3

it should be:
ipv6 nd reachable-time 3000

[z3xpert]

I'm agree with bengini regarding 1.4 the cost should be applied on "area 1 range" sequence otherwise traffic from DC to HQ may be routed via SW202-SW102.

In regard with the virtual-link, it is seemingly required for SW101 & SW102 to see each other via OSPF some candidates whom managed to get their number confirm that they've applied this.

By additioning the points you've missed along the various sections 1.4, 2.1-2.5, 3.2 it's a bit tough to pass the exam

[maxdieng]

Hello i did the exam Yesterday but failed .the machine got  hanged du lack de ressources.the proctor ended the exam and added 5 mn but i think my section 3 Answer did at thèse 5 mn added are not considered.what Can i do?

[maxdieng]

Hello i did the exam Yesterday but failed .the machine got  hanged du lack de ressources.the proctor ended the exam and added 5 mn but i think my section 3 Answer did at thèse 5 mn added are not considered.what Can i do?

[ShoIProute]

10 hours ago, bengini said:

Hey @katfrom what I saw quickly in your config in my opinion there are  few not needed and wrong which might have caused losing points, more  I don't understand how can you pass without finishing section 2.1-2.5 this will impact your overall score, can you share more of the feedback provided, so we can go on through technologies and try to find out what is wrong on the dump:

 

 1.2 
 Is not necessary or required:
           spanning-tree link-type point-to-point

 1.4
        Is not necessary or required:
         area 1 virtual-link 10.1.255.102
         area 1 range 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
 area 1 virtual-link 10.1.255.101 cost 100
 it should be:
  area 1 range 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0 cost 100

 1.6
  ipv6 nd ra interval msec 1000
 ipv6 nd ra lifetime 3

it should be:
ipv6 nd reachable-time 3000

 

Hey @bengini I disagree with ur suggestion for Task 1.6

Check out this blog:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

and this one:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

For the reason why.

Edited March 8, 2023 by ShoIProute
Want to Tag the OP

[bengini]

31 minutes ago, ShoIProute said:

 

Hey @bengini I disagree with ur suggestion for Task 1.6

Check out this blog:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

and this one:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

For the reason why.

here it is :

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[ShoIProute]

4 hours ago, bengini said:

here it is :

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

@benginiHave u actually done a debug and tested how long it takes for the Routers to failover? Can u post a debug with the Timestamp?

The config that I posted above was actually tested. Do u not need to still lower the RA Lifetime in order for the Node to consider that particular Router unreachable? Have u tested the failover urself?

[aceHossy]

Sorry to hear that

[aamirwahid]

thanks

[zshengh]

thanks

[Tubolito]

Sorry to hear that

[parthaitcrax]

thanks

[Certwar]

On 3/8/2023 at 5:56 PM, ShoIProute said:

 

Hey @bengini I disagree with ur suggestion for Task 1.6

Check out this blog:

 

Hidden Content

• Give reaction or reply to this topic to see the hidden content.

 

 

and this one:

 

Hidden Content

• Give reaction or reply to this topic to see the hidden content.

 

 

For the reason why.

Thx for sharing