Jump to content

Student54

Members
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Student54's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Week One Done
  • First Post
  • Reacting Well

Recent Badges

8

Reputation

  1. i bought ccie enterprise stuff from spoto past november, still they are unable to release the material v1.1. This is the first time I buy from them, are they a scam ? Anybody else having same experience with that site?
  2. Even though this is old post, I think this "type of questions" can show up on the lab version 1.1. According with [Hidden Content], boolean OR is the only one that can track both interfaces down. I think the goal of this design is to make sure that when SW101 or SW102 lose its connections with R11 AND R12, the other switch should take the VRRP MASTER role for VLAN 2000 and 2001. "Losing its connection with R1 and R2 does not means to have the Loopback 0 down in both routers, that does not make sense, cause this event will have not benefit for the redundancy of the topology. The question says "declared unreachable", in other words the route to loopback 0 in R1 and R2 is not in the routing table. That is why this scenario cannot be tested by shutting down those interfaces, it should be tested by filtering the routes from going into OSPF. What do you guys think? I think the requirement that "the router must be declared unreachable as soon as it does not respond to 3 probes in a row", is also key, but I have no idea how to configure it. Any idea/clarification would be appreciated. Thanks and I hope this be the year you guys reach your goals.
×
×
  • Create New...