EI LAB 1.8 R24

[kat]

Is this enough?

R24

router ospf 1
 prefix-suppression
 summary-address 10.6.0.0 255.254.0.0
 redistribute eigrp 65006 subnets tag 123

[visasman]

On 2/9/2023 at 9:39 AM, kat said:

Is this enough?

R24

router ospf 1
 prefix-suppression
 summary-address 10.6.0.0 255.254.0.0
 redistribute eigrp 65006 subnets tag 123

One more..

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

 

[kat]

Is this task for 1.8? and why is it needed?

[zshengh]

thanks

[Amro]

Dears

 

i think this the correct answer 

router ospf 1

redistribute eigrp 65006 subnets tag 12345

summary-address 10.6.0.0 255.254.0.0

summary-address 14.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 not-advertise

 

prefix-suppression

 

[LazerFokus]

I kind of agree, that is what I am coming up with - but I feel that something is missing. For a 4 point question, it seems too easy of a solution do you concur?

[ShoIProute]

I agree with everything except for the tagging of the redistributed EIGRP routes for the DMVPN branches. May I ask why we are tagging those?

[Solaire]

You will use it later in a route-map to avoid double distribution. I see that the question doesn't ask you to redistr whole eigrp proccess. I wonder if you need to apply a route-map to get into ospf only 10.6.0.0 and 10.200.0.0

[LazerFokus]

2 hours ago, Solaire said:

You will use it later in a route-map to avoid double distribution. I see that the question doesn't ask you to redistr whole eigrp proccess. I wonder if you need to apply a route-map to get into ospf only 10.6.0.0 and 10.200.0.0

Aren't we already preventing that by tagging the bgp routes into ospf and blocking ospf routes into bgp in 1.9?

[ShoIProute]

On 2/25/2023 at 11:06 AM, LazerFokus said:

Aren't we already preventing that by tagging the bgp routes into ospf and blocking ospf routes into bgp in 1.9?

That's what I thought LazerFokus. Tagging the EIGRP routes feels redundant and unnecessary to me.