Jump to content

imhungry

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

imhungry's Achievements

Contributor

Contributor (5/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Collaborator
  • Dedicated
  • One Year In
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

7

Reputation

  1. Thank you Can you remember which ones were missing / any of the new ones?
  2. Are these your friends own solutions or with a dumps provider? EDIT: To respond to OPs question. I dont know a single person passing the exam. I think Cisco have been successful in creating an exam that will only be passed by dump users.
  3. This is useful thank you. Where did you get this? Is this your solution based on the leaked dump or is this a solution that has been provided by C4C? It would have been even more useful for them to highlight the changes they have made to the ccie_restconf.py file that is provided in the exam.
  4. Hi Robin Thanks for this. Which workbooks? Just the section 1 / half of section 3 workbook from November what was already posted here or do you have more that you’re able to share. I think your answer is right, but when testing this and capturing the DHCP request, the command behaved differently with what fields were added depending on the OS that was running!
  5. I used the 1.0 configs. For these questions the old configs aren’t too far off. You don’t really need the config for my comment though.
  6. This is very useful thank you. I think some of the answers are incorrect. The port security question I think would be C and D. It can’t be A as that is the default configuration and the question states they have enabled port security with no other configurations. Questions 3 would be UDLD and not BFD.
  7. What is your thinking around enabling prefix suppression on a per-interface basis, rather than in the ospf process configuration?
  8. Based on the dump shared by enterprise. I think the answer in 1.7 may not be complete. The last two points in the question: There must be no type 2 LSA in any of the router LSDBs at Global SP #1 This is handled in the answer, point-to-point ensures that no type 2 LSAs are required to build the graph. The LSAs in Global SP #1 must not contain information about any transit links I think this may be asking for prefix suppression? Setting the network type to point-to-point does not remove transit link information from the type 1 LSAs. Prefix suppression is needed for that.
  9. Also when did you take your exam? Would like to hear about the new exam and how close the section 1 dump (questions, not answers) in the share section is to the real lab?
  10. Were you at a mobile lab location or a permanent lab location? I I’ve incorporated the quake 3 on pentium 2 into my labbing now. I’ve policed the connection to eve down to 800k and only use the eve web UI. This gives a similar level of performance to how the real lab feels.
  11. I use it to help me search for keywords to study something I dont understand at all. Otherwise, no. Try asking Chat GPT how to configure NAT with VASI, nothing of sense will be generated. If you do use it for anything, be sure to verify the answer.
  12. Based on the topology diagram above (if correct) we could make some guesses. 1. the SDA portion of the exam no longer depends on the SD-WAN task being completed (maybe it depends on DMVPN tasks to be completed though) 2. Some portions of the LAN in the HQ and the IaaS sites are now part of the SDA Fabric. Maybe this is only the switches that connect directly to the hosts?
  13. I do not think any provider has a valid dump yet since exam change.
×
×
  • Create New...