zeMas

Hi Is anyone aware of changes on DES this week in Dubai? I have 3 friends that will go and will share the status - if anyone has any update let me know Tks

DNA 1.3.x is the same - you should be okay to match the exam DNA DNAC 2.x.x is totally renewed DNAC - to be exactly as the exam and there are some feature you only see on 1.3 such as Fabric Support Device - where you need to click to check if the devices can be joined to the fabric. on 2.1.3 this no longer exists - dnac will check if the device supports itself instead of asking a sync Expect at least 128-192 GB for the DNAC memory, also you need to have SDD disks or it would not bring all services up Good luck

great stuff thanks a lot for your cross checking

Here are the questions and right answer Note: These were colelcted by people and myself - however we cannot entire sure about the question, we debate and the questions are there but we may overlooked something The goal is to help everyone to know what will find and prepare him self better The same goes the other way around - if you go to the exam or receive any update from Spoto, CLC or Chinese, please unicast me or share here I-m planning to retake the exam 2th on late May so I would also need your help -- Good luck to all New questions DES.pdf

well this is what you will find on the exam: rf definition fabd2 rd 10000:1 route-target export 10000:1 route-target import 10000:1 route-target import 10000:414 the question say: if you need to use a RT use 3681. So I´m not sure if it will be correct using the 414 - even if it is already exists. In the question says cleary 'use 3681' - it does not say you can use existing RT and 3681. Basically we can archive every ing using just an RT 3681 - I have tested many times in my lab and I receive the IAAS prefixes in HQ as R4 receives the prefixes from HQ Just make sure to read the question as previous only stated IPv6 but now it is stated 'extend IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes'

be aware that in my exam they changed the question "Extend IPV4 and IPV6..." So the solution I saw was this: On r11 interface gigabitEthernet 0/0 ipv6 address 2001:2710:311::2/64 route-map NHv6 permit 10 set ipv6 next-hop 2001:2710:311::1 router bgp 65001 address-family ipv6 redistribute eigrp 65001 include-connected neighbor 100.3.11.1 activate neighbor 100.3.11.1 route-map NHv6 in router eigrp ccie address-family ipv6 unicast autonomous-system 65001 topology base redistribute bgp 65001 metric 10000 1000 255 1 1500 On r3 vrf definition fabd2 route-target export 10000:3681 route-target import 10000:414 address-family ipv6 interface gigabitEthernet1 ipv6 address 2001:2710:311::1/64 route-map NHv6 permit 10 set ipv6 next-hop 2001:2710:311::2 router bgp 10000 address-family ipv6 vrf fabd2 neighbor 100.3.11.2 remote-as 65001 neighbor 100.3.11.2 activate neighbor 100.3.11.2 route-map NHv6 in r4 interface loopback0 ip address 100.255.254.4 255.255.255.255 vrf definition giosk route-target import 10000:3681 Any comments?

check my post in the other discussion I place some of the questions I recall I got in my exam I did on 29 March Some are doing on Dubai and no change last week I also heard RTP also got same changes on DES

Thanks @visasman for your feedback - i didn´t had the same luck as my design changed at the end of March same in Brussels Can you let me know if the SDA SD WAN you did it using the solutions available on Youtube

Hi Team I cannot share obvious proof of the design changes but can share for sure that Design changed in Brussels and RTP - in Dubain, no changes. The Lab is the same but the design changed - up to 16 new questions, some old questions were added and new questions such as these: Diff between Flexvpn and DMVPN IPV6 - 2 new questions with multiple selection MSDP and multicast new questions Unfortunetly for me I can tell is true since I fail becouse of that - Dubai I know a person who was there this week - no changes on the design and passed - he got lucky because sooner or later the questions will change If you schedule to Brussels you will face the changes and at that day I was with 4 other guys - I can tell that I took 2h20 to finish the Design and I was the first to start typing - going to Lab Section - and the first to leave - most likely they also got the new question by surprise and were in trouble I don´t believe that the exam did not changed for these guys and just changed for me or they would be doing the Design before me for sure - this was my 2 attemp and I only took maybe 1 hour to take the Design the first time that I passed - the questions were the same. If anyone pass or receive an update please share - I will share a doc with the new questions and right anwser. NOTE: These are questions that I took note when I left the exam + testemony of 2 other persons who went to the exam and also got screwed Please note that the question might be incomplete and also the answer might not be correct- because we don´t have the full question confirmation What is default timers in BFD in SD-WAN? Answer: Hello every 1 second, and multiplier 7. When configuring multicast to automatically advertise the identity of the RPs, which protocol takes precedence? Answers: AutoRP BSR Static RP Anycast RP MSDP Is the information in the TLOC visible only in the underlay, overlay or both? Answers: Only visible in the Overlay Only visible in the Underlay Visible in Both They want to put IaaS in area 300 and branches in area 400 and they want that branches will only get inter-area routes and not external routes. Which area fits best? (two options) Answers: Stub NSSA NSSA totally stub Regular Totally stub They configured ERSPAN (switchport analyzer) in IaaS. The source is IaaS and the receiver is the DC (the other side that gets the information). The reason is to debug a technical malfunction in the application in IaaS and they want to show that the network between IaaS and DC is not the problem. The timestamp is not precise enough. What can we do to improve the timestamp of this monitor? Take into account that we already configured PTP in IaaS. Answers: ERSPAN v2 (ERSPAN type III) P2P all accrose the DC Connect to stratum source 3 Configure NTP in IaaS Switch 300 Configure NTP in the DC There's virtual machines in ESX and when we migrate from one ESX to another, everything stops working (IP protocols and none-IP protocols). What are 2 reasons for this to happen? Answers: Port Security Static Mac Address Dynamic ARP inspection CLI config of PE6, shows that RD + RT import-export is configured. BGP neighborship to R62 looks good. no other devices have CLI configs to see. a new email also available email says that R62 is receiving partial routing information while R62 is receiving all routes properly. that R3, the RR, is receiving from R21 at DC is received but routes from the the other branch (or from R61?) is not received by R62 (R6 also does not see the mentioned routes) what is most likely the reason for this? (single choice) Answers: A. route-reflector settings on R3 (the RR) B. Unique RTs need to be Configured C. same RD need to be configured probably one more option was there Travis wants to suppress specific prefix in ipv6, the question is how to do it. He wants to keep sending RA without sending the prefix information. He doesn't want anyone to eavesdrop and get company data. He also wants to have stateful ipv6. Choose three commands. Answers (some commands are not correct on purpose): IPv6 nd prefix default no-advertise Ipv6 nd prefix default [number] [number] no-autoconfig Ipv6 nd managed-config-flag Ipv6 nd default suppress prefix (command might be: ipv6 nd ra suppress) Ipv6 nd dhcp v6 stateful There is another command with the word Autonomous, which doesn't exist. They ask for switches configuration that will be simple, fast and with load balancing. Choose 2 answers. Answers: Use vtp to configure the rstp Change spanning tree timer value Something with MSTP Split the role of the root bridge A question with Filter-list and virtual link. The mail says that everything is in area 0. They put distribute list in switch 201+202 and they don't understand why R23 still see those routes. Answer: Distribute list only affects RIB (and not OSPF database) We want two RPs (active-active or active-passive), how would you do it with redundancy to RPs? Very important to have smooth user experience. MSDP a. Travis said: I prefer standard protocol, but I'll use none-standard if there's a good reason for it, and he's going to use SDWAN in the future and wants sub seconds convergence. They also want option for fast failover if something doesn't work, and transparent to end users. Which one is preferred according to what Travis asked? Because he prefers not proprietary, the answer seems like "VRRP Only". b. What supports sub seconds failover (it's also part of the table)? VRRP, HSRP, GLBP Check if this question was there ***** Given the requirement, what would be the best way to implement the logging on r21? Use a Python script to access the router CLI remotely through SSH and drive the output collection Is the information in the TLOC visible only in the underlay, overlay or both? Answers: Only visible in the Overlay Only visible in the Underlay Visible in Both Email from ANA. We have new SD-WAN branches. In each branch, we have connection to 2 ISP and she wants to check the redundancy. She disconnected one of the lines on purpose and totally lost connection to the branch. She wants redundancy. What should she do? Answers: Redistribute OMP into BGP or BGP to OMP Configure vSmart policy with the site id of the DC Configure vSmart policy with the site id of the Branches New Questions Design.txt So check the questions and study so that at the exam you can read and know the right anwer!