Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi ,

in 1.8 ,  i didnt understand the tag 12345 used  , i think is not mondatory since we didnt use this TAG to a post-filter . for me i will not use TAG for summary address in R24

FYI , i didnt pass last year, i didnt practice enough sec 2  .

good luck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/11/2023 at 10:49 AM, hmizou said:

Hi ,

in 1.8 ,  i didnt understand the tag 12345 used  , i think is not mondatory since we didnt use this TAG to a post-filter . for me i will not use TAG for summary address in R24

FYI , i didnt pass last year, i didnt practice enough sec 2  .

good luck

 

de

Edited by deepdiver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi EZZ ,

yes , im planning to book in mid-sep ,  good luck too .

for the TASK 1.8 , for exemple if the ospf  inject  10.6.0.0/15 in BGP process (without TAG)

lets see R61 :

R61 inject only his  loopback 10.6.255.61/32 in BGP :

chinesedumps-r61#show bgp vpnv4 unicast all | i 0.0.0.0             
 *>  10.6.255.61/32   0.0.0.0                  0         32768 i
chinesedumps-r61#

 

we didnt recieve the exact subnet from ISP , see below advertised routes from R21 .

chinesedumps-r21#show ip bgp neighbors 100.3.21.1 advertised-routes | i 10.6
 *>  10.6.0.0/15      10.2.10.2               20         32768 ?
chinesedumps-r21#

 

so i think while R61 , R62, R70 advertised only loopback /32 , and they recieve only subnet /15 , there is no loop in control plane.

thank you for your feedback , good luck EZZ.

 

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...